ED REFORM:
What changes under Act 73?
View a side-by-side comparison table
View a side-by-side comparison table
There have been a lot of changes to federal policy in recent months that are affecting Vermonters. Some have taken effect, some have been proposed and are under consideration, some have been implemented and then reversed, and some are working their way through court challenges. We will keep this page updated as much as possible as new changes happen.
Yesterday, Congress ended the longest federal shutdown in history. What’s included in the funding package:
What’s not included in the funding package:
Here were some impacts of the shutdown, by the numbers:
The federal government shutdown began on October 1st, the start of the new federal fiscal year, after existing funding expired and Congress failed to approve new funding. Until funding is restored, many federal workers in the state are furloughed (put on temporary leave) or working without pay.
Federal workers in Vermont: 6,590
The Office of Management and Budget is trying to use the shutdown as an opportunity to lay off federal workers, targeting employees at the Departments of Health and Human Services, Homeland Security, Treasury, Education, Housing and Urban Development, Energy, Commerce, and the Environmental Protection Agency.
Vermonters working for federal agencies that are targeted for layoffs: 2,775
The shutdown also means that certain federal programs and functions that use discretionary dollars are currently paused until funding is restored. For example, National Parks will remain partially open to the public but mostly unstaffed, Head Start grants (which help to provide early childhood education, health and nutrition) may be delayed for certain grantees, and new loans for farmers will be paused. As the shutdown continues, more programs could be impacted, including nutritional supports for women and children.
Women and children in Vermont at risk of temporarily losing nutritional assistance: 10,366 total, including 1,810 infants
In addition to the many grants already frozen or cancelled before the shutdown, the administration is permanently cutting grant funding during the shutdown for projects that expand renewable energy and address climate change, including two projects in Vermont.
Healthcare premium assistance
One of the main issues at stake is an extension of the Affordable Care Act (ACA) enhanced premium tax credits, which increase subsidies for ACA Marketplace health insurance and expand eligibility for subsidies to those making over 400 percent of the federal poverty level ($62,600 for an individual in 2025). These enhanced subsidies expire at the end of the calendar year, after which subsidies will return to their pre-COVID levels unless Congress extends them.
Vermonters receiving enhanced premium tax credits for healthcare in 2025: 30,280
Total enhanced credits to Vermonters: $65 million
There is currently no indication of when the shutdown may end. The longest federal shutdown in history was 34 days (2018-19).
On July 1, the Senate passed a budget reconciliation bill with substantial changes from the version passed by the House in May. The new, amended bill then passed the House on July 3, and the president signed into law the so-called “One Big Beautiful Bill Act” on July 4. The details below are final. While some changes take effect immediately, other changes won’t go into effect for years. For example, many benefit and funding changes to Medicaid will take effect after the 2026 midterm elections, while more restrictive eligibility requirements for the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) will take effect once the U.S. Department of Agriculture issues guidance.
Medicaid
The final bill makes a number of changes to Medicaid that will result in coverage losses in Vermont and nationally. These include increasing how often people must submit benefit renewal paperwork and requiring 19 to 64 year olds to work or participate in training programs for 80 hours a month to qualify for benefits. The law also further restricts immigrants’ access to health insurance by limiting Medicaid eligibility to fewer groups of immigrants, including removing eligibility for refugees and those granted asylum. While Vermont was already expecting to see big cuts to Medicaid under the bill passed by the House in May, the state’s expected Medicaid cuts doubled under the final law: Vermont could see a nearly $2.7 billion drop in Medicaid funding over ten years, and hospitals could lose nearly $400 million. Notably, 16,000 Vermonters could lose their health insurance.
SNAP
Significant changes to SNAP will impact Vermont beneficiaries and the state budget. Currently, the federal government pays all SNAP benefit costs. But under the new law, states with payment error rates (underpayments and overpayments) above 6 percent must pay between 5 and 15 percent of benefit costs starting in fiscal year 2028. Depending on Vermont’s payment error rate, the increased cost to the state could range from $7 million to $22 million annually. The bill also reduces federal funding for the administration of benefits starting in fiscal year 2027 and institutes stricter work requirements for 18 to 64 year olds than previous requirements under SNAP. Finally, the law prohibits benefits for people with certain lawful immigration status, including refugees and those granted asylum. In Vermont, an estimated 40,000 families could lose some of their food assistance.
Tax Cuts and Credits
The final law permanently extends Trump’s 2017 tax cuts with some additional changes. In addition to making corporate tax breaks permanent and changing tax rates and brackets to primarily cut taxes for the wealthiest, the law also increases the amount of state and local taxes paid that filers can deduct from their federal taxes. Under this provision, filers with incomes of up to $500,000 can deduct $40,000 in certain state and local taxes paid from their federal taxes (with a phaseout above that amount) until 2030. In Vermont, the law is expected to save the richest 1 percent nearly $60,000 on average each year, over 500 times more than the expected savings for the bottom 20 percent. The top 5 percent of Vermont taxpayers are expected to accrue over $440 million in savings in 2026. More than 70 percent of all benefits—$730 million in 2026—from this tax proposal are directed to the top 20 percent of Vermonters.
The bill also increases the maximum Child Tax Credit to $2,200—an increase of $200—and makes it permanent. However, credit requirements are expected to leave an estimated 19 million low-income children out of receiving the full credit because their parents earn too little. Furthermore, the bill denies the credit to children with a social security number if both parents do not also have one, disqualifying an estimated 2 million children nationally.
On July 4, the president signed the so-called “One Big Beautiful Bill Act” (OBBBA) into law, cutting social benefit programs and providing tax cuts that primarily benefit the wealthiest Americans. These cuts were passed by Congress via reconciliation, a separate process from the annual appropriations process. That budget process begins with the President’s budget request and involves discretionary funding. Reconciliation is typically used to change mandatory spending, like Medicaid. The final details of OBBBA’s funding changes are listed in the dropdown above. While some changes take effect immediately, other changes won’t go into effect for years. More information on the budget process can be found in this explainer of reconciliation. Additional information can be found here.
Medicaid provides health insurance to low-income families and individuals, including children, parents, pregnant people, seniors, and people with disabilities. The House committee that oversees Medicaid was instructed to make at least $880 billion in cuts over ten years. In response, Congress passed several changes to Medicaid to cut costs, including instituting work requirements, increasing the frequency of eligibility redeterminations, and removing Medicaid eligibility for refugees and those granted asylum. Under the new law, an estimated 16,000 Vermonters are expected to lose Medicaid coverage. Vermont could see a nearly $2.7 billion drop in Medicaid funding over ten years, and hospitals could lose nearly $400 million.
Impacts of final bill:
More on the impacts of cuts to Medicaid in Vermont:
SNAP benefits provide food assistance to Vermonters with incomes up to 185 percent of federal poverty guidelines. The House committee that oversees the program was instructed to cut at least $230 billion in spending over ten years. To achieve these cuts, Congress instituted stricter work requirements, shifted some benefit and administrative costs to the state, and prohibited assistance for certain people with lawful immigration status, including refugees and those granted asylum, along with additional changes. More than one in ten Vermonters receive food stamps, nearly three-fifths of whom—40,000 households—may be impacted by these cuts. Depending on the payment error rates, starting in federal fiscal year 2028, Vermont could be responsible for covering $7 to $22 million annually in benefit costs previously paid for by the federal government.
Impacts of final bill:
More on the impacts of cuts to food stamps in Vermont:
Congress passed a permanent extension of the 2017 tax cuts with some additional changes, including temporarily boosting the amount that taxpayers can deduct in certain state and local taxes paid from their federal taxes. Under this extension, the top 5 percent of Vermont taxpayers—those with incomes above about $320,000—are expected to reap $440 million in savings annually. These tax cuts are expected to save Vermont’s top 1 percent of taxpayers an average of $60,000, more than 500 times the cut for the bottom fifth. Congress also increased the maximum Child Tax Credit. However, the structure of the credit will leave an estimated 19 million low-income children out of receiving the full credit because their parents earn too little. Furthermore, the bill denies the credit to children with a social security number if both parents do not also have one, disqualifying an estimated 2 million children nationally.
Impacts of final bill:
The reconciliation bill directs $140 billion in new funding to U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) and Customs and Border Protection (CBP). Both ICE and CBP enforce customs and immigration law, typically with ICE working in the country’s interior and CBP working at the borders. ICE manages immigration detention and deportations, while CBP conducts inspections to detect and prevent unauthorized entry into the country of people or goods.
ICE received nearly $75 billion in supplemental funding, including $45 billion for constructing and expanding detention centers and nearly $30 billion for hiring 10,000 new employees—a boost of 50 percent compared to current staffing levels. This one-time funding is in addition to annual funds passed through the appropriations process; in Fiscal Year (FY) 2025, Congress appropriated over $10 billion in base funding for ICE. While this base amount could change in future years, it has historically increased over time. These combined investments are expected to double immigration detention capacity from more than 50,000 beds to over 100,000, including through the construction of new family detention facilities and “mega-facilities”.
As of the end of August, over 60,000 people were being held by ICE in detention centers, roughly 70 percent of whom have no prior criminal conviction.
In addition to new spending for ICE, the bill provides nearly $65 billion in supplemental funding for CBP. This includes $12 billion for agents and detention and over $6 billion for border surveillance technology. It also provides $47 billion for additional infrastructure along the southern border, including new stretches of wall, other barriers and lights. While some border infrastructure has already been built at a cost of over $20 million per mile, most of it is not contiguous, and long stretches of the border have no barrier at all. Like supplemental ICE funding, the supplemental CBP funding is on top of its annual appropriations funding, which is $23 billion in FY 2025. CBP has long been the biggest federal law enforcement agency by funding and staff size; these new allocations will likely catapult ICE to second place, surpassing the FBI.
Impacts of final bill:
The Trump administration has implemented many changes to federal agencies, funding, and regulations. Some of these are by executive order, while others are through agency policy. These actions continue to evolve as many are being challenged in court, and some are being reversed by the administration itself. The information below provides a high-level overview of some of these actions and potential impacts in Vermont. However, impacts will continue to change depending on lawsuits and federal actions.
The administration proposed pausing federal funding under 2,600 different programs. While federal funding freezes are being challenged in court, the impacts of these freezes are already being felt in Vermont and could be astronomical. Federal funding accounts for roughly one third of the state’s budget,
or more than $3 billion. Certain nonprofits and state agencies have already lost funding due to freezes, including funding for food assistance, vaccine access, the humanities, and climate and flood resiliency. Social Security payments make up the bulk of funding to individuals—more than $3.6 billion in FY24.
More on the impacts of federal funding freezes in Vermont:
The administration has fired tens of thousands of federal employees, with plans to fire at least a hundred thousand more. While lower courts ordered a temporary pause on layoffs within several agencies, the Supreme Court ruled on July 8 that firings may continue while legal challenges to the layoffs progress. This decision leaves many of Vermont’s roughly 5,000 federal employees uncertain about how much longer they will have a job.
Note: These numbers should be taken as estimates rather than an exact count. There are some differences in timing and methodology resulting in discrepancies in the reported federal employees in the state.
More on the impacts of layoffs of federal employees in Vermont:
The federal administration has taken several actions that impact the quality of life for both documented and undocumented immigrants in Vermont. This includes unlawful deportations, barring immigrants from accessing public benefits, and temporarily revoking student visas. The administration has also provided the Department of Homeland Security unprecedented access to confidential Medicaid and IRS tax information, and has requested data from states on all SNAP applicants and recipients in the last five years. The Vermont Agency of Human Services shared SNAP participant data with the federal administration the week of July 28th.
These actions impact immigrants, the communities in which they live, state employers and the economy, and much more. Many of these actions are being challenged in court. This includes a lawsuit brought by the Vermont attorney general, along with 19 other attorneys general, over the illegal use of Medicaid data.
More on the impacts of executive actions related to immigration in Vermont:
For help with immigration issues in Vermont, contact:
To learn more about your rights, visit:
Vermont Language Justice Project Know Your Rights (multiple languages available)
The administration has proposed dismantling the Department of Education. In addition to other impacts, this would mean less money for Vermont’s schools and its students and employees, impacting more than 100,000 Vermonters.
More on the impacts of executive actions related to education in Vermont:
We welcome and publish non-partisan contributions from all points of view provided they are of a reasonable length, pertain to the issues of Public Assets Institute, and abide by the common rules of online etiquette (i.e., avoid inappropriate language and “SCREAMING” (writing in all caps), and demonstrate respect for others).
The economic impacts of the bill are horrific. But the attempt to protect offials who are charged with contempt of court for disobeying judicial orders is equally horrific and must be made widely known…..
As a person in the lowest bracket, I would love to yell at lawmakers, but they have closed their ears and their hearts. Simple talk does not reach them. They seem devoid of empathy. The only voices they listen to are the very wealthy who keep them in power.
This is class warfare!
How much more tax burden can the Feds shift to the states? This is such a pernicious and hidden issue. Combined with the expensive and failing health care system, how can Vermont remain a healthy, vibrant state?