THE LATEST FROM THE VERMONT SENATE:
On education funding reform
05/23/25 11:10 AM update
05/23/25 11:10 AM update
Montpelier should be trying to make the education tax system simpler and fairer. But Republican Gov. Jim Douglas is proposing changes that would make the system more complicated and less fair: He’d increase taxes on middle-income Vermonters and lower them on wealthier ones.
Sound crazy? Then how about this: The Democratic-controlled House appears to be moving in the same direction.
Read Paul Cillo’s op-ed, from the Mar. 14 Times Argus and Rutland Herald.
We welcome and publish non-partisan contributions from all points of view provided they are of a reasonable length, pertain to the issues of Public Assets Institute, and abide by the common rules of online etiquette (i.e., avoid inappropriate language and “SCREAMING” (writing in all caps), and demonstrate respect for others).
It is sad to see the legislature with such a herd mentality. If the leadership would simply propose clear changes that make the property tax more progressive, the rank and file might know how to move. Why not tax ALL property including intangible assets—that would make the tax progressive and fair for the first time in 70 years. If one had to pay a tax on a mutual fund at the same rate as one pays it on real estate, just imagine the shift in taxes AND reduced pressure on land for “highest and best use” development.